Sean Parnell files an Emergency Application to Supreme Court Justice Alito arguing that PA Supreme court violated 1st & 14th Amendments of the Constitution by dismissing with prejudice an election lawsuit…
This filing is a straightforward case with a simple legal question on the surface: Was Act 77 constitutional, or was it not? And if it’s not constitutional, what does that mean, legally speaking? This is something that can be decided in large part by SCOTUS without an evidentiary trial.
The best thing SCOTUS could say is that the trial court judge has to actually listen to evidence.
Read the filing.
New #SCOTUS writ argues PA Supreme court violated 1st & 14th Amendments of the Constitution by dismissing with prejudice an election lawsuit.
Kelly, Parnell, et al. just filed FINAL EMERGENCY APPLICATION to Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito.🔻 pic.twitter.com/NRPHiwZyUF
— Kyle Becker (@kylenabecker) December 2, 2020
Stay Up To Date With More News Like This:
Help Centipede Nation Stay Online
Stories like these are made possible by contributions from readers like you. If everyone who enjoys our website helps fund it, we can keep our platform alive and expand our coverage further.